Sunday, April 10, 2011
San Diego Showing
Texture and Abstract are showing in San Diego soon. I think the show runs from mid-April through May. Given the geographic spread of my readership of three people, I’m pretty sure no-one is near Balboa Park; but since I was asked to help spread the word it seems a post is the least I can do:

I’m sure they’d love to take your money if you are in the area and would like to see some compelling art work. I can’t imagine a better location!
Friday, April 01, 2011
Double Rainbow
I inadvertently stubbled across a meme this week as I was developing some imagery. I’d been working on some ideas I’ve had about breaking the rules of landscape photography by creating some vertical compositions and I developed this shot of a double rainbow:

Of course, this lead students to point me toward the Double Rainbow phenomenon on YouTube. Its over a year old now, so I’m late to the party, but I thought I’d link to it here in case you’ve missed it too:
This eventually led to the Double Rainbow Song (now available on iTunes):
...as well as various other parodies, such as the Actress Monologue:
Apparently I’ve been living under a rock. But the sad thing about this is that seeing a double rainbow is really a very cool thing. Or better yet - a triple rainbow! I’m pretty sure though that a triple rainbow would have sent YosemiteBear into such fits of apoplexy, that he likely would not have survived the experience.
Monday, March 21, 2011
Hudson Gallery
If you are in driving distance to Toledo and looking for a short trip, you might consider swinging by Hudson Gallery in Sylvania. I’ve got a couple of images showing there right through April, and I’m sure they’ll appreciate all the traffic that gets sent their way. The opening reception for the show is Saturday March 26th from 4PM - 6PM.

The images I have showing include Texture and Abstract. You can see samples of them here.
PS: I just realized that the names aren’t on the site. Basically, they are DesertTextures_S.jpg and DesertTextures_R.jpg, respectively. For the visually oriented, they are the last two on the next to last row : )
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Of Photography and Printing
Some of my sabbatical work this term has gone into the professional development of my digital photography. And, I’ve learned a lot of new things, especially in regard to printing. I’ll describe more about that later in the post, but first I want to underscore the importance of the medium in photography. Of course we all know the impact that the medium plays in the quality of the final image; but working through all these photos (about 6000) over the past few months has helped me appreciate all over again the differences between imagery presented electronically from imagery produced for print. I suppose I am still in some way surprised at how certain imagery will work wonderfully electronically and not in print - and vice versa.
I’ve also come to recognize that I’ve underestimated the importance of Depth of Field - particularly for large prints. I was specifically working on that with this series of images, but failed to give it enough emphasis. I’ll look forward to getting back into the field to correct that! But I’ve digressed from the printing issue…

Over the past year I’ve had the opportunity to carefully evaluate several large format printers and consider their impact on the final results of my work. (I’ll preface these comments by saying that almost all of this imagery looks good at smaller resolutions) At larger print resolutions, color becomes more of a factor and truthfully - the quality of the print head and its ability to deliver precision points of ink, plays a large factor. So, how do you decide what you need if you want to print larger photos than the 8 x 11 that any good inkjet can do?
First, the number of inks makes a difference. In my comparisons, any printer with more, separate, ink wells gives results that are more true to the image. Aside from that, it comes down to the precision of the print-head and the quality of the software drivers and the printers color-matching abilities. You have two fine options for A3 printing - both the HP Photosmart B8550 and the Canon PIXMA Pro9000 are good printers. The quality of the Canon prints is clearly superior; but the HP is much cheaper, and in my experience, reliable. HP makes some higher-end models, but they are newer and I haven’t had the opportunity to test them. Its conceivable that the quality of these might be closer to the Canon, but for less than $200 the B8550 seems hard to beat.
But I need more precision and larger prints for my own work. That means I’ve got to move up to the next level, and of those printers I think the Epson Stylus Pro 3880 holds the most promise. You can find a good review of it here. And this blog does a nice job of identifying the strengths and potential weaknesses of the device.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Lights, Camera, Capture!
If you are interested in photography - or interested in the future of publishing - you might be interested in Lights, Camera, Capture! at the iTunes Store. This is a book/DVD combo that you can buy from Amazon for $29. But you can also get the content for $9.99 by purchasing it as an app for your iPad.

This title is a very nice, basic introduction to lighting for photography (useful for filmmaking as well) and the nature of the app medium is that it combines the text and DVD video into one package. I actually think its much better than the book/DVD combo and a good example of how this type of publication is better than the traditional media it replaces. More often than not, I prefer to read the physical hard-copy of a text. But in this case, I prefer the app since it conveniently places the relevant video content immediately within the context of the text itself. That means I actually access it - when I have DVD content associated with a text, I rarely access it. After all, that would require me to:
1. Find said disc
2. Goto computer
3. Wait for optical media to load (uugh.)
4. Try to remember what I was wanting to watch and why
Its too much of a cognitive break - and its the reason why combined media have never been effective (aside from marketing purposes). Another nice thing about it is its portability. If I’m shooting in the field, I’m not going to want to take several books, a laptop, and the corresponding media. I can just take my camera and iPad.